A recent thread mentioned their company, G Media, offices being raided by police because their porn was illegally explicit. These types of stories seem to rarely have happy endings, as porn and the law do not have a good relationship.
So, does anyone know what's going to happen? If any current members get news or updates from the site about its status, could you please pass it along here or in the above mentioned thread. I have yet to be a member of this site, but it's on my list, and I am steeling myself for the reality that it might not exist in the near future. :(
This kind of mirrors dingle's review of the site but, as I just clicked the cancel rebills link and directed Abby's crew to come here to see why I'm not re-upping, I wanted to make it easier for them to see this. It assumes they'll make the effort and I hope they'll respond.
I just watched the lastest video - a 321 meg file, 20:25 running time and, yet again, it was over 16 1/2 minutes of the model talking away before she started to undress. This trend almost has me wondering if AW is heading towrds becoming a non-nude site. Okay.. maybe that's a stretch. But what they're doing now is not something I'd ever knowingly sign up for. The same goes for the picture sets. The matching picture set to the above video was just as bothersome. 236 pictures with the first HINT of nudity at pic #135.
So what's the standard now? Picture sets that are 2/3rd's clothed? Picture and video resolutions that look upscaled - especially the outdoor shots? And who decided that a good porn site should include such yawn inspiring videos such as a girl prattling on about what a lazy day she had?
I never thought I'd have any feeling like this for a porn site, but I have to say I was a bit sad to see this one go down like it did. This used to be one of the few sites I'd actually let rebill. Not this time. Again - what a disappointment.
These are quotes from another forum I'm on, all from the last couple of weeks.
"the vids are boring - girls just talk and sit down and start masturbating."
"I have to agree with everything that's been said here. The girls aren't as cute as they used to be and the nudity in a lot of sets is minimal. And suggestions for improvement always fell on deaf ears. They won't be getting another membership from me."
"i was a longstanding member awhile back and wish it would return to its roots. "
"here is another example of why AW is getting so bad...they had a recent model rebekah, very cute (doesnt happen that much anymore) and no nudity until last 2 minutes and its not much... what is this sites problem????"
"They seem to have fallen into a rut and lost their creativity."
"they did it again...new vid with Cate a very cute girl (nice to see) and during her vid she just sits on her ass for the whole video...cant really see her really nice body...they really need to understand what people want in the vids (i guess they feel intellectual conversation is what guys want - they have no clue)... have the girl get up and do something interesting (its a video)"
So it's not just us, here on Pornusers, who see that this site is in a serious decline. Please, SueAnn (or whomever might respond to this), tell us what's really going on at AW!
I normally join sapphic erotica every year and this year I was looking forward to seeing what movies had been added. I will come back and tell you more soon, I've only joined this morning so can't comment on much yet. Just wanted to say that theres a real gem of a film in there, its called katy_deniska_and_alana , I think they are American, they are outside on a matress in their driveway and boy they are hot and really into girl on girl sex, they seem to can't get enough of each other. One of the most passionate scene I think I've seen in a while. Two of them virtually rip the clothes off this first girl and lick her all over. Very impressed with this movie and worth the re join fee just for this I think. Theres some hot stuff with Suzie Carina too which I'm looking forward to downloading, love her smile. She's called Klara here though.
I'll report back on what I think of the rest of it soon. Still in my opinion is by far the best lesbian site, sure a lot is poor with the use of toys and the passionless models sometimes but there is still the older stuff and there are true gems in there to be found.
I hope to see more of maybe using American girls again or even aussies and brit girls.
does anyone know why the last update shown on the tour page is dated 2007/08/03? Seems as if they stopped to release new stuff which is a bit of a shame since they offered lots of beauties worth looking at.
For some reason I thought it would be a good idea to join this site again to replace some of the material I accidentally deleted recently. What a damn mistake, I expected it to all be recycled content, but they appear to have removed all downloadable videos and zips from the site, making the price absolutely absurd. Oh well, lesson learned, hope no one else makes the same mistake I did.
...until I saw the TBP review that said the 720x576 videos are taken down after a few weeks, leaving only 352x288 vids available. Had I not checked on TBP, I would've been pretty disappointed being left with only the lower resolution option. To me, 720x576 is marginally acceptable these days.
An anonymous error report saying that there are no full-length scenes is also a concern.
I've know about this site for a few months now and there are a number of elements that intrigue me. However, I keep holding off on joining and I'm not exactly sure why. It's one of a handful of sites I've found that seems to feature a number of girls with short hair (a HUGE fetish of mine) and strap on sex is very high on my list of pluses, but at the same time I wonder how much the girls get into the wrestling and competitive aspect. I'm not a fan of the WWE and would probably prefer a light bondage theme more since I'm not into hardcore BDSM either.
I think that the authenticity of the site would really be a deciding factor though and even if only some of these girls come out fighting it's probably worth joining. The site is run by Kink.com which operates a number of sites, so if you got full network access I probably would have forked over the cash a long time ago but the single site access leaves me on the fence.
I will say that I watched a 2+ minute clip on the tour page of the site and I was definitely "encouraged". I like tough chicks that could be called "tomboys" by some, but sites with kick ass chicks usually tend towards the bodybuilder types which can often go too far for me. I like a fit girl who knows what she wants and goes out to get it. Actually, I like women big or small with my only real requirement being that I can't see every part of her rib cage.
So, if anyone has anything to add I'd be a happy dude. If I join I'll most certainly add a review!
It has been too long since I was a member to write a full review. However I still have many videos that I downloaded. The wrestling is just ok, the videos not clear enough to be really hot. It is very difficult to really see the girls in anything resembling a closeup as the shots are taken from too far away. The set has no personality, it is just the inside of a building and looks like a loft or warehouse. The sex parts are sometimes hot, but almost always vaginal use of dildos. Very rarely is there any anal use. Sometimes they seem to be not much into it, this is a real mixed bag. Using a dildo may be fun for some winners but, the best parts I felt were the forced cunt licking until orgasm. At least the winner got something out of winning. However most of the time the winner simply used a dildo vaginally on the loser or sometimes forced the loser to suck a plastic dildo, no big thrill for me,and seemed uninspired and unenthusiastic. Most of the time the winner was predictable as the matches were not close. Definitely don't join for the wrestling.
I have been a member of the 21Sextury Site for almost 2 months and so far I would rate it as ok. I am not going to write another review because there are already plenty of good ones but I wanted to add a few commens of my own. I have to agree with Dracken about much of this site. The models look so much alike I feel like every video is the same. I also agree with Dracken that there is something about the preview selection that make your options look unexciting.
I have looked at the recent review of TBP but when I visit the site I see a huge amount of real live penises fucking the girls in the previews. Why is the site sorted under the lesbian category? Am I missing something? Lesbian means no penises made of real flesh to me.
They remind me of myself, five years ago. I had subscribed to an erotic site for the first time and it blew me away. I let the webmaster know how much I liked her (his) site and Abby (Winters) suggested that I publish my high opinion in Porn Users. Of course, I did not do a review but made a comment instead. I did not see myself as a shill for the site and saw nothing wrong with it. If I remember right, quite a few climbed all over me for that. BTW, I am still grateful to Abby Winters for sending me here.
We've just had a 100-score for this site - sorry, do not get it.
The amount of stuff here is huge, but the content?
It may be a matter of taste, but most girls here are somewhere between plain and ordinary in the amateur-way. Except from the boring lez-scenes, it's close to beeing just a nudist-site..
Ok, if that turns on some, fine by me - but a 100.
Been a member twice (the second time in hope for improvement) - never saved anything...
I have never joined this site. The new 2.0 review boasts a huge score at 95. However, I have read comments the past few months about the site going downhill. Also, I don't remember seeing the discount before? As a first time member, what's the verdict on joining this site at this discounted price? Any opinions and comments are welcome.
After a long break from abby im back and that same old wasted monies feeling comes back.
Not alot has changed on the videos & photo shoots. The normal 19+ pages of photos and nothing until page 17 on some shoots.
The videos 25 mins maybe 3-5 mins of full nudity (Full nudity for me means seeing everything) I know this is "Un-scripted" but com'on at least tell your models to not cross their legs when blabbing on for 15 mins!!or hide behind curtains ect.
Im quite gutted as there is still some very nice models but the video format is still the same and a HUGE waste of 500mb+HQ/750+ HD per video.
Todays video "Kyle" made me write this c'mon abby folks 14mins and near end just a quick flash now and again (such a shame) but i cannot understand why so soft when she has done a intimate moments shoot???? This can also be said for some other shoots older ones are more nuddy and new one's like are like a free video that comes with your porno mag (Top shelf rated 18+)
I just dont under stand abby could be sooo much better & are missing a huge money market, I read somewhere on here or their forums "Alot of members join every now and again" Eh? you should be getting people hooked and paying each month.
Erm im trying to think of plus side... Ponders for 5 mins, oh yeah there is still quite a few hard core vid's dildo/fingering-but if your joining just for them i would look else where because not every update is like them.
The site has had a re-vamp and to be honest it much better and with search options and favorite options and links and HD- the photo sets really have a zing and load up quick.
Phew a big load off my chest, after seeing the reviews here and still the 85+ score im really not sure who is writing these reviews!!!
For me this is my VERY LAST vist to this site,and i will have a hunt around for a soft/amature site which SHOWS the pubic areas-such such a shame !!! And i shall not be fooled by the trailers again in the "Explore site" option..
Based on the tour there is some extremely cute girls, but a few girls featured with big tattoos which I don't really like. Anyone been a member and can tell me the ratio of girls with big tattoos vs none? I don't mine girls with the small hearts or butterflys etc.
I have been a member of this site off and on since it was launched. To say this site was 'niche' would be putting it mildly, but let's face it, it does what it says on the tin, and I don't think anybody can claim to have been misled if they join!
I was a little uncertain about the increased trend in video content but I have to say I am now a total convert. As a Brit myself I am particularly pleased to see (apparently) British models being used (no offence to my US/European cousins), this I feel Ed should exploit a little. The girls are natural and really get into the gist of what the site is all about; most appear to be amateur which I think helps (although Cate Harrington appears in some content - no bad thing though as she is very hot!); they also wear their own clothes with occasional forays into fancy dress. The girls come in all shapes and sizes too. (my current favourite being Natalie more more more of her please!)
I am also impressed with the openness that the site owner (Ed) practices, running two web forums both for paying subscribers and those who aren't members - this is a very useful dynamic and Ed is careful to point out that it is an opportunity to influence future material. He is also scrupulously open on these forums about the site and always tries to meet criticism head on; this is a bus on which some of the big hitters in the industry have yet to embark.
The website seems far more stable than it was two or three years ago, with occasional crises over running out of update content long in the past.
I have two minute criticisms of the site:
- there is no set day of the week for updates, with new material appearing sometimes every 24 hours and sometimes after 5 days, that said you will always get an answer on the two forums if you chase Ed about a perceived overdue update!
- a large proportion (but by no means not all) of the 'Bonus' material actually appeared on Ed's other now static website "A Measure of Curiosity" (www.amoc.com), so if you're an old customer of that site expect to see some familiar content. Again Ed has made a convincing defence of this practice and of course the amount of this older content is finite.
So then - if you like watching attractive girls playing and losing stripping games then this site is for you - if you don't, it isn't!
I've seen Ed on the forums for a while now and knew he was a webmaster of course as it says on his avatar but just never clicked on the link at the bottom of his posts until now, I think mainly cause stripping isn't something I'm usually gonna look for so the name never captured me before but I clicked on it today and looks very different and fresh, not many sites dedicated to stripping, well not that I've ever come across.
My questions to any member or Ed himself, do you get access to a-m-o-c.com too with this membership. Do any girls have sex after the stripping.
I'm English so it was a refreshing change to hear some English accents though, amazingly I've never joined any English porn sites and well I've never come across one to be honest I thought was worth joining, but this one does interest me somewhat on its uniqueness.
I've only just subscribed to this sight, mostly because of SnowDude's review. At a glance it's really not at all my cup of tea, so to speak. I'm not heavily into competitive sports - I've never been a fan of wrestling. Generally, lesbians/bi-sexual interaction between women isn't a high-ticket item for me.
I've watched 4 of the more recent matches - avoiding the ones where the comments point out that one of the newer ladies really was just letting the other lady have her way with her. I'm totally addicted to this site.
I don't know if I have the skill to write a review, but I felt I should comment. The people behind this site have basically created a female wrestling league with a sexual twist. Most of the women have been involved in more than one season (they're up to 5), so most of them are very serious about the wrestling. But they're all very sensual women - so they love the sexual side of it, too. Most of them are really trying and in the end have a great time whether they win or lose. And most who do lose seem very driven to do better next time and really want to come back as soon as possible.
It all feels very genuine which is very different then every kind of other porn out there. Some of the women clearly didn't know what they were getting into and appear to just be waiting for it to end. But most of them are really wrestling and fucking and having a good time doing it. It's more than just porn - it's hybrid sports. Try it, I think you'll be surprised.
In some of the comments I've made on other sites I've asked for a full access trial to make up my mind, but the price here does seem really reasonable. What keeps me from clicking the join button is the lack of variety though in that much of the content is the same. If I could be so bold, could you add more of the boy/girl scenes? If they did I'd definitely join, but perhaps there is a reason they haven't. I love lesbian normal looking girls, so I'm not really complaining. However, even straight guys like to see some male parts intersecting with the female ones if you get my point. :) I think it would add some variety and draw more people in from a wider spectrum.
Well, well, well. I bite into the notion that Abby would be a good girl & satisfy my sexual urges being your typical all american horny male type. But alas, I was sorely disapointed by the limited minds who put the website together & the equally underinspiring actress sex goddess wannabees. If you choose to check out this site, please go the cheapest way possible instead of the recommended 3 month $40 plan I wasted my hard earned porn bucks for. I went through the site in 3 days with limited exposure time & it was just more of the same. Such a shame I couldn't cancel & get at least 2 months back. This was such a let down after reading the excellent reviews by the "experts" on this site who obviously haven't spent some quality alone time to really desire primo porn. I'd give this Abby Winters site a 20.
I disagree with the American viewer above who was clearly disappointed with the site. Everything he disliked I love! AW presents natural girls who are very erotic for *exactly* the reason that they lack that silicone breasted, shaved Barbie look found on so many sites. The selection of pictures is huge, navigation is easy and I like each and every model, from slim to plump, from smooth complexion to pimples, because they are very appealing in their lack of self-conciousness and manage to keep their dignity intact, despite their nudity. There's nothing that would degrade any of them on this site. I know that I don't want a meat market, because today's Porn is about as exciting as watching paint dry.
I've been looking for ages (without knowing what I was looking for) for an ABBYWINTERS. Well done, Abby! Now, if only you would feature a few mature models now and then, I would truly be in heaven. Highly recommended to those who prefer the natural look in women. I will definitely keep renewing as long as the site exists.
Is AbbyWinters really worth it? I've wanted to join for a couple of years (yeah) now but never have. As far as I can tell, the regular (I think silver) membership seems to be pointless as all I hear is that you need GOLD access to really get anything good, but at $30 for one month without ever being able to try it and see if it's too your liking makes this a hard sell for me.
I think a short trial would be beneficial as I can't bring myself to shell out $30 for a softcore site without seeing if I fancy it first. And yeah, I'm a newsletter member but that's not really seeing.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.