That's right dear fellow PU's -especially my fellow europeans compadres for obvious reasons-. They are charging 63 or 66 euros -if i remember correctly the former-, [the reviewer stops to satisfy his obssesive impulses and goes again to the site to see if 66 is the right amount, and...it is 66 euros not 63!]so that puts to rest the association of Ccbill with suspicious billing practices... It's the websites! Khan, was right from the start.
... because I like the webmaster and his enthusiasm too much but I would ask all those who read my review to take off at least 10 points if they are not into a "hair" fetish.
Nine updates this month alone feature models with hairy legs! Mind you, this still leaves 51 fairly straight updates, but the site is starting to look way too earthy for me to feel comfortable seeing it listed at a whopping 99 under my name.
Therefore to all ye who may be tempted to subscribe: if you are into body hair in general, including anal, pits, arms, legs, this site will still rate very highly with you given all its good points. The quality, the lay-out, the search engine, the updates, the friendly and helpful webmaster are all still there.
If, on the other hand, you like clean looking girls who have remained traditional by keeping their pubic hair but who shave their legs (as everyone except for hippies and women in rural Transylvania did for as long as I can remember,) then an 89 would be a more realistic rating for you these days.
This is still a pretty good score for a pretty good site, I think! And with a bit of sifting you'll still get a lot of good stuff. I just don't like to see my 99 connected with hairy legs! Ever! :-)
... is the short pre-action interview with the model in the beginning of many of the videos. I understand the reasoning behind it, it is meant to re-assure tender souls (and the law?) that the submission is not only willing but actually anticipated but to see a model gush how much she looks forward to the "abuse" makes the whole rough "play" unbelievable right from the start. The post-action interview is fine. This habit of a pre-action talk with the model is common to many Kink.com sites and I, for one wish they would do away with it. I know it's all game playing but why make it so obvious?
A trial not worth having. Went to site and seen the big flashing lights of the new 1.99 trial so i gave it a shot. Well you get to view 3 scenes (video and pic set)from the site and that's all. Anything else you click on will ask you to upgrade. I wouldn't of mind if the 3 scenes were very good ones(it is a trial after all) but the scenes were average in my opinion. Wish I had a flux capacitor to do a redo.
Why, oh, why cannot RE Productions make a proper hardcore latex site? RubberEva looks very nice bit lacks the hardcore f/m side. They are not shy though as on RubberClinic there's quite freaky stuff and also hardcore but otherwise that's quite over the top and DRM'ed. Then there is their site PlasticLovers which looks good but has no latex.
Can anbody recommend other sites that might fill the niche?
I signed up to CosplayErotica as it was a baby and since that time I'm obsessed with the guys. They was good from the beginning, but they managed to improve a lot. Amazing costumes, great pictures, exciting videos and on the top of that an own dream world with block buster cgi.
They say that my account is not found.
However, I can log in.
And they say "Connect by e-mail."
However, I have not received the reply of the first mail.
Nothing is not only obtained, but I will pay 40 dollars.
I am very sad.
I'm not usually an aficionado of softcore photography sites since I'm definitely a hardcore video type of guy, but even if you are like me I'd really suggest taking a look at this site. One of my favorite porn bloggers includes their stuff on her "nerdcore" themed blog since the nerds among us (ok, I'm one too and damn proud) like that sci-fi or, in this instance, fantasy genre look to the girls. There are plenty of known girls here as well as some newbies and the quality of the full size photos is excellent.
With all that said I don't think it's a site I'd be a member of for a long time since, again, I'm a video guy. However, I'd keep the downloaded members content in a safe place and already have some of the site's free stuff in my main porn gallery (the one that's actually on my hard drive, not in my archive of DVDs). Suffice it to say though that lovers of softcore photography should definitely take a look for something just a little different from all the rest.
I was a member too long ago to write a full review, but I still have the videos I downloaded. There were many top notch attractive women on the site and mostly the sex was creative and interesting. Most, if not all, are recognizable pornstars doing things that you don't see on your average mainstream sites. I feel definitely an acquired taste as this is a BDSM site though. Some scenes are worth rewatching just to see the chemistry among the participants. It had a real enough feel to the sex and sometimes there is even a story. This site has some things missing in many mainstream porn videos. My only criticism is that you get just the one site, even though there are others in kink.com that you have to pay for separately at full membership price. They should have the other sites included or at least give you a break on the price if you join more than one site.
This is one site where I've joined one hour and canceled the subscription the next! The navigation on Zoliboy is absolutely horrific. I am trying to find the latest updates but only get so far. I am trying to find a complete video but can only find segments. I know there are provisions to download three segments in one, but they are only part of the whole video.
What's worse is that the segments are misnumbered, eg. I downloaded v-500052-394.wmv and v-500052-395.wmv and find that the latter is actually the beginning of the video.
Even more aggravating is the fact that when I took the tour of Zoli's I saw "Lusty Grandmas" listed as one of the bonus sites but am now being told that I will have to wait two months to get access to that site. I really feel ripped off.
If there is a simple way to get a complete HD quality movie from Zoliboy then I'll take back everything I wrote above and put up with all the bonus sites I really don't care for. I could have got the same material through Videosz. There are a couple of mildly interesting reasonably mature sites but that's about it.
Please help re. Zoliboy. I won't even go back to his site unless someone replies and tells me how I can find a way to download a COMPLETE video in one click. Is there such a thing?
I noticed the webmaster answered several question so I'm going to ask mine in hopes of a helpful answer either from them or from a member of the site.
As weird as this is going to sound I love legs and stockings but get kinda disgusted by feet.
On the site preview I noticed many hot leggings and leg shots but also girls licking toes. The first I love the second I dislike, what is the approximate ration of feet content vs leg related content? Do all or most videos end in a foot-job? Do all girl/girl scenes involve feet kissing?
Since Chanta's Bitches stopped dating its updates, it seems like the website is just recycling old material in a loop. I've belonged to it several times in the past and think it's the same stuff all over again, but I'm not sure since I didn't keep any downloads from the site. Anyone know?
I've just canceled my membership on this site too after pretty much 5 years continuous membership. As many others have commented, it has become very repetitive with the same girls shot by the same photographers every two or three days. In days of old it used to be 7-10 days before you saw the same girl twice.
It has also moved more mainstream recently - Aria Giovanni is on here these days. Nothing against her, she's a gorgeous woman, but hardly an "amateur".
And finally my old favourite Sean R. seems to have lost his mojo. As I put in my review on here a while back he used to shoot the most fantastic close-up gaping pussy shots, but he's not quite so up close and personal any more.
Any finally, finally! still don't bother with the video!
Does anyone have connection issues with this site?
This is the only site where I have problems signing in, as well as navigate within the site once I'm in. If I want to be successful I have to hit the "reload page" button on my browser over and over until I finally connect. Just clicking once on the link won't do it because if I do it that way I could sit there for minutes waiting for a page to load and it never does. I thought it might be my browser but this is the only site where this happens. Any helpful suggestions would be appreciated.
Now that this OLD Kscans is on the hot list with a new review at TBP:
The site has GOT to be updated and gone through improvements very seriously since Maggie gives an 82,0 score.
Have not been here for years - but I remember a time when some PUs (this one included) had different inputs - some even named it 'Kscams' - which (at that time) was well put.
Any PU there now?
BTW: Maggie very cautiously states:
'All content is exclusive (advertised as exclusive)'
Yes: ADVERTISED! - but browsing the previews: NOT exclusive - any of it!
As I'm at my word limit for my review and I haven't had personal experience of this, I thought I'd do this as a comment update rather than try and edit my review.
According to a CFNM forum I have read, CFNM.net are up to their old tricks. Not only do their best videos remain on the never-updated, DRM-riddled CFNM.TV which requires a seperate, pricey subscription, they have now apparently announced that they have "responded to users requests" and are stopping doing any more videos.
This happened IN THE MIDDLE of a new series, so was was a video series is now photos only! In future, only photosets will be relesased.
For the price they charge I am astonished. As I said as I haven't personally confirmed this, and as I have no intention of paying their high subscription fee just to confirm the worst, I won't change my review or rating but add this for info and a warning to others!
The money they charge for the photosets they do, which don't even have particularly large or good quality pictures, makes this site a real no-no in future in my opinion. SO sad because they have the best ideas and models! Sad.
I have seen a lot of very extreme stuff in porn, I even like the harder stuff, but never in all my ~20 years as a perv have I seen something quite like ProlapseParty.com. I am not judging it but seeing stuff like this on a mainstream pay site makes me wonder if anything is beyond the pale anymore?
I just joined with the two day trial. The only thing about the site that works is the preview pages, which look great, and billing my credit care. The site itself does not work at all nor do any of the included sites. The browser goes into orbit permanently, no pics no vids no nothing. Sent inquiry to webmaster and will update this if I get a response.
Just saw this newly listed at TBP and it's intriguing. I'm definitely a nylon fan, and IMO the more layers the better... as long as they come off eventually!
I've never been tempted by OT - I like the T but I think I'd find the O merely frustrating. Would be interesting to see how explicit this site is and whether it leaves us wanting... just a shame the preview is fairly poor compared to the other OT sites, there is little sample material to see.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.