I was browsing around and took a peek at the site. Clicked a girl's thumb and it took me to the join page. Whoops! But we know that's pretty common. My mistake (was hoping for an enlargement or more sample pics, like they do at ATK Galleria).
Clicked to close the window and ... a box came up offering an unspecified "last minute discount." At the same time, another box came up with lines showing up (being typed) from a "live agent," it said. I think someone was there, reaching out to help me.
I finally figured out how to escape with my virtual, window-shopping self.
Just wondering if there's any reliable research that shows this kind of approach works. Me, I'll just go in and rejoin some day. Devi looks like being part of the "rationale."
I asked a friend, who has a subscription, about this site and he told me the content is hazzy at best.
Girls that sometimes are described as hardcore only have softcore shots and the videos lack in quality as well as quantity.
I am uncertain what to do (get a subscription or not) I remember he showed me a set where you were promised sex between a teen and an old guy but the whole set was just the guy dancing around her and kissing her...rather disappointing...is the whole site like that? Can you find some nice hardcore on here?
I agree with the positive comments others have made about the concept, models, artistic presentation and skilful editing and presentation of the content.
But, and it's a very big but: having been encouraged to subscribe by seeing Ifm videos on xHamster (where downloads are very simple, and quick, and allow you to jump about the clips immediately within seconds of downloading) I've found the site is absolutely spoiled by tediously slow download speeds, apparently un-openable and incomplete clips and the inability to hop about the clips with a mouse-click.
Although I have a modern laptop and I'm reasonably competent with it I acknowledge I may not have the skills to get the best out of the Ifm server, but if xHamster can provide a slick presentation with nearly every video for free, why can't Ifm do it for a substantial subscription???
And as others have said, the 'formula' looks and pose (NB singular!) become boringly repetitious very quickly.
I am at a loss to understand the many subscribers who downgrade a set from this site because it doesn't feature enough leg-, arm-, pit-, belly-, buttock hair!
This is one of the advantages of having a comments section now, you get to find out how your fellow users feel about a particular set or video and it sure makes me once again an outsider.
I suggested today that maybe the site should be renamed ATK Scary Hairy because more than 50% of today's 8 updates featured body hair other than the pubes. Who in tarnation would find a hairy leg exciting? Well, in this case, almost EVERYONE, it seems.
I am sure I will get the required thumbs down in the site from the body hair lovers so that my comment will disappear because the "community" disapproved of my scathing remarks. Argh, I guess that's democracy! :-) And I was being provocative and judgmental, I'm afraid, so I'll deserve being shunned!
Still .. hairy legs as a turn on? Who would have ever thunk it?
Honestly, friends at TBP!
I don't get it. From a users point of view - how can you guys at TBP honor this site with an average of 90,8?
The content should be in the 70...and that's better than fair...
The photos are not swell and most of the videos are just bad/average.
This is one of the FEW situations at TBP (and thank you!) where I have just a slight idea of somethings are not right.
This site is NOT worth the high points at TBP - 90,8- for me it looks like an inflation in points....
Don't you guys wonder why it's so much less among us users????
I'm with DigglerFL on this one: Poor photos and poor videos.
I joined Karups PC several years ago. In the meantime, I moved and got a new card. You cannot (as far as I can tell) cancel from the EENT page, and I have emailed support quite a few times, gotten only one response, and silence after that. They revamped the site, and I can no longer access it, but my money is going into the black hole.
I keep going back to this site time and time again, tempted to finally take the plunge and subscribe and there's always something to stop me from doing so. This time the fly in the ointment is found in their limited tour.
How the heck can you judge the quality of their videos if they offer you a "reduced quality sample" only? The end effect is that those who are interested in videos will say, "I'm going to stay clear of this site because I'm not quite sure what I'll get!"
I thought it was only appropriate to commend these folks for their very open tour.
Whilst some may think their members pages look a little dated, they are actually quite intuitive in use, and through a few clicks you can see all the content of a selected model, albeit mostly in thumbnail form.
Some sites throw a lot of functionality out of the window when they revamp a site.
The layout here shows that a fair amount of thought has gone in.
If & when you do update, please keep the open informative non-member area.
Oh & I do like the way they stretch the 'teen' element.
It is very nice to see a young lady mature over a few years & sessions. ;0)
There is a clear cut division between those who love full body hair and those who like things more moderate eg. possible pit and pussy hair but no more than that.
Just to make a decision easier for either side here is a clear statement of intent by ATKowner addressed to someone who expressed a desire to see an otherwise gorgeous model without her heavy leg hair:
ATKOwner to xxxx:
I doubt very much if Monica would consider shaving her legs and to be honest with you we would not pass on such a request to her as we are about promoting hairyness in women. So we generally encourage women to grow out if they are willing but not the other way around.
For ages I have been pissed off by 'merchants' who pretend to sell you the moon - without delivering more than half a glance of it.
A niggardly 1GB/day is exactly that.
Noty only, but: The sister 'company' is doing the same, and the only reason, which I can imagine, for the very existance of the split into two websites, is their way to maximise the amount of money, whhich they can drain off you.
Caveat Emptor! (Let the byer beware!)
Moneywise, 'g-queen' cost you more/month, but check what you get...
You decide what is better value for your money!
As yet, TBP has not made a review on 'g-queen', which is to my astonishment... However, they can't be everywhere at the same time...
By now TBP has been notified about the existense of 'g-queen' and hopefully we shall see a review of it within a reasonable time.
Has anybody figured out the structure of this site? It's like a labyrinth and when I was a member of the site for a month before, when it first opened, I think that I totally missed how much content there was - or they added tons later. It's difficult to tell how much content there is, I find, unless you click on every "More" button that you see, until you get presented with dozens of galleries of the model that you're looking at - lots of ATK Exotics material here and stuff from other ATK sites as well - fun but confusing at the same time.
I just received a special offer that would give me this site for free if I re-subscribed to ATK Natural and Hairy. I know I haven't been too complimentary when it comes to the latter but if Archives is any good it would be worth considering the offer.
So, here's the question: Does "archives" stand for mainly outdated formats like 800x600 px for picture sets and 640x480 for videos, or is there newer stuff to be found? Thanks!
membership and cancel a few days later, then, exactly two days later, you are not allowed anymore in the site. I signed on February the 24TH and cancelled the 25th, well, soon enough, on February the 27th i can't access the site.
This is what they write to you when you join the site: "Your transaction has been processed by EENT, Inc. through RSBilling. You can cancel at any time and your membership will continue for the remainder of your subscription. After the initial period (30 days) you will be billed 29.90 every 30 days."
It seems that they do not fulfill their promises.
And be sure that i have typed endless times my username, password and the verification code.
On february the 27th i received this e-mail: "Dear KarupsHA Member,
You are receiving this e-mail because your membership is expiring today. We thank you for being a member and hope to see you again sometime in the future. We have recently created Facebook and Twitter pages for our fans & members, where you can get sneak peeks of new models that continue to be added regularly."
So i was member for a total of four days, some deal i made.
Does any one else find it creepy when a web-site has the girl holding a sign that names the city where you live and says "(that city) Rules!" I understand how a computer program can do this by reading your computer, but I find it unsettling. How much else is that site reading from my computer?
I did check and found the "Reviewer's Special" price easy to find. Maybe because their computer is busy reading mine.
Anytime I see a paysite where the women are getting their bodies covered in cum by one man (NO GANGBANGS!), I do my absolute best to join that site!!
One thing that attracted me to your paysite was Tanya's scene, where not only do she take a hot naked shower for the camera, but received a very nice massive load all over her ass and her back, VERY NICE!! Her ass was looking soooooo arousing just by the folds and the lines underneath her asscheeks as she was receiving a massive cumshot all over her ass!! The shape just makes you want to grab it and it would be dumb if you didn't do so!!
The only problem with that cumshot scene in particular was the guy had to jack off in order to shoot!! In that case, he could've still humped her to an inevitable point, that pull out and shoot his massive load right on her ass like he did so, with the same point of view camera angle he used!!
In some porn, paysite, DVD's, there are a lot of that!! I want to see natural cumshots... The kinds where man hump a chick until he has to pull out, then he pulls out and shoots... NOT JACK OFF TO SHOOT!!
Oh well... A little less porn and a bit more tech forum sites for a while...
Seeing that the webmaster of this site seems so responsive I thought I'd ask the question here.
This is for the subscribers to the site: Are the sets a good mixture of "portrait" and "landscape" style or are they shot mostly in "portrait?"
This is for the webmaster: If they are mostly "portrait" is there any chance of getting the photographers to take more pictures in my favorite format. To me it's a joy to see the whole screen of my monitor taken up by picture. "Portrait" with today's pics takes either too much scrolling, or too much reducing.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.