If you take a good look at my reviews, you will see I don't give too many sites high ratings. In fact sometimes I have been critical of sites that others have rated much higher. That being said, I read with great interest the updated reviews by the TBP editors. To summarize, I feel that they are critical of aspects of the site that are of only a low level of importance. After you join a site and download what you want, do you really remember if the site has a plain design? Who cares? Certainly not me. If I see a site that is unusual in its content and creativity, I am happy that it also has a large amount of content. You won't hear me complain that it may have a been a bit slow to download. Six months later you have videos that you still watch and forget what the site even looked like, let alone if you may have wasted a little bit of time. I use download managers and then leave the computer, so how is that critical to my rating of a site? All four reviewers said great things about the site, but not one gave it even an 80 score.The only time I would care about the superficial is if a site is a complete disaster in its organization, site design, or download times. Overall, I think PU is usually much more informative than the TBP reviews.
While 21st Sextury has some of the best photographed porn videos on the net and I've been as member on and off again for years, I've noticed that the sign in procedure seems now more frustrating than ever before.
When I go away from my computer for a few minutes, they require me to sign in again with my email address and password.
Because I don't get to select my password, I have to type in a ten digit set of letters and numbers that they gave me. If it doesn't work, I am then required to try again, but this time with a new 4 digit authorisation (that's their spelling)code which is extremely hard to read.
Trying to cut and paste these items each time they need to be used doesn't seem to work well, either....so I find myself spending 2 or three minutes trying to log-on.
This is very picky of me, but I've been spoiled by Kink.com and other user-friendly sights that don't have any log-in problems.
Doing this over and over again is very annoying for this consumer.
These are beautiful girls, but the scenes are all pixellated. The other sites such as Japan Mature have some beautiful mature women and some are not pixellated, but most are. What a shame, some of the glistening clits are magnificent
This site has only been live for a few months and they are already fucking about with the dates on the content and reposting some old stuff as new. It's already a time consuming enough process to organise my collection, when sites do things like this it just means I would have to waste more time re-organising. I'm not prepared to waste the time with them so I'm done, membership cancelled.
except some few sexy models (megan avalon,angela salvagno) this website is a waste of time: video boring ( too much pumping clits stuff )and very bad filming, most ugly models i have ever seen(kat connors???dd). More, there is no download way for the video it's scandalous, more of that , the streaming is in average resolution Conclusion, i have solicited a refund i had never got!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.