Following my recent review, my subscription ends in a few days and this is my last time home, so I've just downloaded the last material I will get from here....
We kept a film with my favourite model Susie (Dido elsewhere) to watch at the end... what a shocker. It was a washed-out, blocky, pixelated mess - I can't believe anything this technically poor was put on a professional site, effectively unwatchable. As I said in my review, clearly no-one is bothering to check on the quality of the material any more.
I also quickly looked at another film - it was a DP scene with James Deen, so it had a pretty high uggh factor to start with but it did have a sort of creepy fascination. The girl was a scraggy little thing with buck teeth, an average little porn girl and a long way short of the standard x-art used to have. It was just shot from the middle distance with no style, and the end was careless - a guy came on her face, a quick clunk edit to a shot of her with obvious fake cum for 2 seconds and clunk, the film stopped. No time or care taken at all.
These two films sum up why I am out of this site... It really isn't glamcore any more.
As always, these guys are fairly aggressively marketing to ex-members like myself. Their latest (Halloween-themed) e-mails advertise a deal on six of Met's sites, mostly on the harder end of the scale, including one called MagikSex that I hadn't previously heard of. Anyone know what the deal with this site is - how long it's been around, whether it's a pre-existing site or a newly created one, etc?
From the previews I looked at, it seems like the hardest site in Met's network currently with the possible exception of Ninn (e.g. there's a fair amount of orgies and DPs), but still artsy. However, oddly for this network, I've seen some of the content before - at least some of it seems to be repackaged from various Private films. So seeing it on Met's network is odd, to say the least.
Beeing fed up with a lot of repetitive porn, this site is the first I've joined for quite some time.
But like Drooler mentioned in September "For $10, You Can't Beat It"
Ok, it's now 13,95 - but still a good price for something different. Ok - it's softcore - but I like that, too. And here we got (still got) British and other Euro-models - some you can't find elsewhere - and some great models doing posing and strip - and they still update some of the rare once like Laurena Lacey with older nude posing vids - and Brooke Bailey and Lisa Marie - both british you won't see much elsewhere.....It's a nice site, if your're into softcore.
PS: Have not been at PU much lately. Two reasons: Have only joined very few sites and then: my English is getting rusty - maybe it's age........
MetArt adding a tinge of more eroticism to some photosets.
MetArt is still softcore. But yesterday, 2013-10-19, they added a softcore lesbian photoset of two models. The models actually were shown touching and kissing each other's breasts, as well as kissing each other on the lips. A few years back the models might have looked at each other with their eyes, but fondling was strictly forbidden.
I guess Met-Art is trying to boldly step into the new world of eroticism, where being nude is not enough to satisfy its audience.
I really love their style of work and they have great quality pictures, but does anyone know if they'll have any low priced deals anymore? I occasionally got emails from them, but the past year I haven't got anything.
I for one wish X-Art would hurry up and launch their harder-hardcore version -- it that is indeed still in the pipeline.
I keep looking for videos that explore more vigorous anal and facials but with X-Art models, style, production values and beauty.
One idea I've become increasingly drawn to is seeing "glamour bukkake" or high-end, high-quality art videos devoted to women consuming semen slowly from their faces. It doesn't have to be a gross-out 20 men who provide the semen, but it might be from 2 or 3 guys.
The point is there really aren't any HQ artistic videos exploring the semen fetish today out there. Glamorous facials that take some camera time (like 5-15 minutes) and show lots of semen worshiping and slow semen eating -- this sort of fetish I would love to see from X-Art.
All with lots of eye contact.
Many men get off only after the male actor has ejaculated. For that very reason, X-Art and other glamour sites ought to spend more time on the post-cum head and various fetishistic ways of eating cum. Perhaps from champagne glasses or pacifiers, perhaps just right off another female model's face, perhaps off a glass table top.
But something harder-edged and more fetishistic is in order. Not gross and mindless, like "1000 Facials" or some German/Japanese bukkake high-volume site, but something artistic and expressive of the love a woman can show for a man's sperm.
I firmly believe that a web site is only as good as its customer service. Once again this week, Met Art demonstrated that it is an AWESOME web site by providing some of the best online customer service I have ever experienced.
I upgraded my subscription from monthly to annual. My monthly subscription was through Epoch and my annual subscription is now through their new biller(Rocketgate?). What I did not realize is that Epoch had already queued me up for my monthly charge, which I saw on my account a few days after upgrading. I sent an email to Met Art support telling them about the issue. Within a few minutes, here is first class the response I got:
My name is amnon and im the CEO of MetArt,
So sorry for your trouble; however rest assured you are in great hands and our support team is looking into this issue ASAP.
we will make you happy.
all the best,
OK, I'm not easily impressed, but here is a guy who truly understands how important it is to be responsive to customers.
So many other websites (adult or otherwise) really don't care when there are problems and some (often adult) are downright obnoxious (Go look at the chain of my MPL Studios comments. I complained about an easily resolvable problem and MPL Studios blamed ME and permanently kicked me off of their site.)
Oh, and yes, I was promptly refunded the Epoch overcharge and received a follow up email from Met Art customer service to ensure everything was OK.
Kudos to Met Art for not only having a terrific web site, but for ensuring that, in the words of the CEO, "I am happy". Yes, I am happy. Thank you very much!
I did a review on Fame Girls -- although over a year old -- that's not mentioned anywhere herein from the staff person writing up info on this current review.
I thought this was normal practice, to bring previous reviews back just to let readers know it had been reviewed here at another time. It couldn't help but offer additional prospective and add some hype to this latest review.
The content is obviously of the highest quality, the models are beautiful etc... With that said, I feel they could use some more diversity( as is the case with other similar sites)
Now, to the tech aspect of things, it's getting ugly. They have a timeout link limit at less than an hour. They don't support multiple connexions on the download manager, and many, many times, downloads seem to stop out of the blue. Whatsmore, their server doesn't support resuming downloads, so this only makes things worse.
Download speeds also vary greatly. Sometimes they are good, sometimes they are low.
Also, another thing that comes handy to me when using IDM, it's that it has a feature where it dates the file downloaded with the timestamp of the server, so I have date info on all the files without having to put it in the filename. Well, this works on every site EXCEPT Joymii.
So, while the site is very good content-wise, it makes life difficult with regard to the downloads.
I saw one video of Meddie and Stacy, titled "Afternoon Orgasms", posted 2012-11-09, that is a shortened version of the same video posted at Beauty Angels (part of the Teen Mega World network). Meddie is called Meddie at TMW, but the other model is named Stasy. That video was posted 2012-04-16.
Very good video, 2 attractive models, nice lesbian scene.
I was wondering why some models and their sets have been deleted. Have returned to the site after a hiatus and went looking for some of my favorite models; only do discover some of them, and all their seta, missing. Berengere A, Alessandra D, and Roarie A come to mind immediately.
Does anyone know why Met Art deletes some of their models and all of their sets?
This site remains on my to-join list since it features a number of models I like - although a bit tempered by some of the download issues folk have had and I'm not sure if there are still restrictions.
However, it's worth noting that if you like the style - and UK models - the photographer's work seems to be featured quite heavily on at least 3 other sites I know of:
Just wanted to quickly share my experience with the Metart Network's customer support.
I had read in the forum that after joining one site , you can join any other for $10 recurring. I didn't know that this offer stands only for an hour and is given by an automatic link, which after an hour expires. After that, it's $20 recurring.
Now, I don't have a credit card, I use a debit VISA card, which I use only for online shopping, so I rarely keep any money on it, which means I have to manually put money in, whenever I want to purchase something. I had $20 in, so I got SexArt, with the intention next day to try TLE, Ninn,Randall, at such a great price.
To my surprise, I found that this offer would be valid for only an hour (it was the evening here, couldn't make any deposit). So I'm emailing their support to tell them what happened.
Not only they were polite and responded fast, they REFUNDED my initial purchase, completely cancelled my membership, so I could rejoin next day from start and get the discounts for all the sites I wanted.
This kind of customer service is awesome,hard to find I think in the adult websites industry, and creates loyal customers. Qudos to them.
The ONLY thing I would like to see from them support-wise, is a live chat, which is much faster than email exchanging, although as far as e-mailing goes, they were very fast with their responses. Over 13 emails exchanged in 24 hours.
There's a new photoset at Rylsky Art featuring a model named Jeff Milton.
In spite of her boyish name, she's a knockout.
I wonder where they get the names they use for these models?
Rylsky Art is a new site, started last year. So the site contents are still small.
But Rylsky is a fine photograph, featured at Met Art.
And he has an eye for attractive young teens.
As the site adds more content, it will be worth more.
I wouldn't recommend joining the site, unless you have a favorite model that is featured here. Or you got a steep discount from the $29.99/month regular price.
The style is basically Met-Art softcore approach, with just a touch more harder edge.
But no hardcore that I've seen. No boys at this this site. Just solo girl, or soft girl-girl.
Does anyone know if there has been some changes since Hicks died earlier this year? I know the price changed, but I was wondering since this was one of my favorite sites. By the way, at the time of Hicks' death was he actually doing some photography for DD?
I've been checking back their updates page lately and oh boy it doesn't look that good... :
- models' quality drop (at least for me)
- less and less videos
- site is so slow (am I the only one from Europe having issues?)
This site has undergone a recent redesign. It looks better. Trouble is, the thumbnails in the galleries are still really small, and there's no way to adjust that other that to magnify the size of the browser window (or do something of that sort with the system toolie thingies) and get a nice big table full of pixelated T 'n A.
Just got a mail: Get free access to any of the sites...
The entire - and newer Met Art Network - not for me: One day! - and then a month at normal price.....you got to be fast to cancel, LOL.
They got this new site: Stunning 18 - including (apparently) new sets of the cute Sasha Rose - but: she's back to beeing a brunette.......and: it had to come: New tits....
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.